Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Louis Campbell v. Jason Bunting
as 12-4568
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS CAMPBELL, aka David Walker
Respondent - Appellee:
JASON BUNTING, Warden
Louis Campbell v. Jason Bunting
as 12-4470
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS CAMPBELL, aka David Walker
Respondent - Appellee:
JASON BUNTING, Warden
Beason v. Weirich et al
as 2:2012cv02880
Plaintiff:
Sherman Beason
Defendant:
Amy P. Weirich, D.A. Office, David Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Romalis Gray
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Morgan County Correctional Complex, J Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
David Walker and Thomasina Walker
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. and Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abbott, et al v. Gallion, et al
as 5:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mildred Abbott , Lisa Abraham , Juanita Alton and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, William J. Gallion and WJG Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2009cv00388
Defendant:
Keith M. Whitaker, Sr., Marty V Donini, David Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose et al v. Unicoi County et al
as 2:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
Billy J Ambrose, Barbara Ambrose, Bobby J Ambrose and others
Defendant:
Unicoi County, TN, David K Harris, Michael - Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2007cv00537
Plaintiff:
David Walker, David Walker and David Walker
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
