Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 18,885
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff: Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant: Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party: State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe (T.B.) v. Red Roof Inns Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff: Jane Doe (T.B.)
Defendant: Red Roof Inns Inc, RRF Holding Company LLC, Red Roof Franchising LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff: Marcus V. Green
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff: GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant: RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Spencer v. Stoyk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11255
Plaintiff: Ronald D. Spencer
Defendant: Stoyk, Duperron and John Doe
Woods v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv02304
Not Yet Classified: Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff: Steve Woods
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as The Home Depot and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff: John Doe #066
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff: McClain Durst
Defendant: Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Handsome v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11230
Plaintiff: Marwan Hasan Handsome
Defendant: John Doe

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?