Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell-Guyton v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
as 2:2015cv11444
Plaintiff:
Dorris A. Harrell-Guyton
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorris v. Smith
as 3:2015cv00110
Petitioner:
Charlie Dorris
Respondent:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nichols v. Stanley et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clayton Owen Nichols
Defendant:
Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Stanley et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clayton Nichols
Defendant:
Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Stanley et al
as 3:2014cv01436
Plaintiff:
Clayton Owen Nichols
Defendant:
Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorris v. Robertson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2014cv01202
Plaintiff:
Donna Rae Dorris
Defendant:
Robertson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dorris et al v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
as 3:2013cv01141
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Dorris , Eric Klauss and David Rowe
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Besaw et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Travis Besaw , Donna Branham , Ben Bratcher and others
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
