Cases 21 - 30 of 33
LeFlore v. FBOP
as 6:2018cv00233
Petitioner:
Malcolm LeFlore
Respondent:
FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. FBOP et al
as 4:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Keelan Harris
Defendant:
FBOP, Harrell Watts, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Zambrella v. Ward et al
as 6:2017cv00233
Petitioner:
Taurus Zambrella
Respondent:
Ward, FBOP and U.S. Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alex Cook v. Chief, U.S. Marshal, et al
as 17-3095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF, U.S. MARSHAL, Personally and doing business as U.S. Marshal Service, WARDEN, Personally doing business as FCI Elkton and Records Dept. and DSCC DIRECTOR, Personally doing business as FBOP Designation and Sentence Comp Ctr.
Roller v. Dankwa et al
as 5:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
John Roller
Defendant:
Vibeke Dankwa, Francisco Quintana, FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold v. FBOP
as 6:2016cv00042
Petitioner:
Edward Arnold
Respondent:
FBOP and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. FBOP et al
as 6:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Eugene Thomas
Defendant:
FBOP, Federal Prison Camp - Pekin, Federal Prison Camp - Manchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burley v. FBOP et al
as 6:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Martin Burley
Defendant:
FBOP, C. Eichenlaub, Richard Ives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents et al
as 1:2013cv01763
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents, Joy Flowers Conti, Thomas Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castro v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Louis Castro
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, FBOP and USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
