Cases 21 - 30 of 206
Gresham #272603 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Robert M. Crompton, Zachary Pant, Lydia Pant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clendenin v. Hunt et al
as 1:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Shane Clendenin
Defendant:
Chad Hunt, Daniel Abbott, Mike Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reilly v. St. Clair County et al
as 2:2022cv11952
Plaintiff:
Jamie Reilly
Defendant:
St. Clair County, St. Clair County Jail, St. Clair County Commissioners and others
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Gilbert Ramiro Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gilbert v. Paparazzi, LLC
as 2:2022cv11339
Petitioner:
Heather Gilbert
Defendant:
Paparazzi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Miles v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv10272
Plaintiff:
Mario Miles
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Michael Duggan, James White and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McClean v. Ogemaw County et al
as 1:2021cv12444
Plaintiff:
Breanna McClean
Defendant:
Ogemaw County, Brian D. Gilbert and Paul Frechette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Heeg, et al v. United Electrical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
Travis Heeg, Dalton Parish, Andrew Crampton and others
Defendant:
United Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ALBERS et al v. SIMPSON et al
as 4:2021cv11834
Plaintiff:
DENNIS R. ALBERS, DALE E. BOGART, JR., TONY D. CARDWELL and others
Defendant:
FREDDIE N. SIMPSON, DAVID D. JOYNT, BRUCE G. GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
