Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Hitchcock v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02386
Plaintiff:
Jay Hitchcock
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilliam v. Sequatchie County Tennessee Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00187
Defendant:
Sequatchie County Tennessee Sheriffs Dept., Ronnie Hitchcock and Clint Walker
Plaintiff:
Rodney Clint Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Sequatchie County Tennessee Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv01303
Defendant:
Sequatchie County Tennessee Sheriffs Dept., Ronnie Hitchcock and Clint Walker
Plaintiff:
Rodney Clint Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Sequatchie County Tennessee Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2014mc00729
Defendant:
Sequatchie County Tennessee Sheriffs Dept., Ronnie Hitchcock and Clint Walker
Plaintiff:
Rodney Clint Gilliam
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. Hitchcock Center for Women, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
Denita Scott
Defendant:
Hitchcock Center for Women, Inc. and Mary Bazie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stone v. Hitchcock et al
as 1:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Stone
Defendant:
Ronnie Hitchcock, Clint Walker and Leonard Suterland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmon Deaton v. United Bank & Trust Co., et al
as 12-5584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMON BOYD DEATON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED BANK & TRUST CO., DANIEL HITCHCOCK and SHARON R. MUSE, Special Master Commissioner
Deaton v. United Bank & Trust Co. et al
as 5:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Carmon Boyd Deaton
Defendant:
United Bank & Trust Co., Daniel Hitchcock and Sharon R. Muse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
