Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv01033
Plaintiff:
David Udell
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Advance Auto Parts, Affinia Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Udell et al v. Advance Auto Parts et al
as 1:2012cv10000
Plaintiff:
David Udell and Sylvia Udell
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Advance Auto Parts, Affinia Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall v. ITT Technical Institute et al (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Scott F Marshall
Defendant:
ITT Technical Institute , Sallie Mae, Inc , Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv10703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azar v. Sallie Mae, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv13196
Plaintiff:
Christina Azar
Defendant:
Sallie Mae, Inc. and ITT Educational Services, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dotson v. Sims et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Dotson
Defendant:
Gary Sims, L. Bobb-itt and L. Freeman, Rev.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Ridenour et al v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
William L Ridenour and Tommy Lee Brown
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Robin Knab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ross v. ITT Cleveland Motion Control et al
as 1:2009cv02220
Plaintiff:
Felicia L Ross
Defendant:
ITT Cleveland Motion Control, Cathy Rose, Ted Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
