Cases 21 - 30 of 5,538
Cassaday v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Kevin Cassaday
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heron Cove Association et al v. Gladwin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv11473
Plaintiff:
Heron Cove Association, Cynthia Abbs, Brian Abraham and others
Petitioner:
Dona Kraft and Tammy Patterson
Defendant:
Gladwin County Board of Commissioners and Four Lakes Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kevin CassadayIn re: Kevin Cassaday
as 24-1487
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kevin Cassaday v. USA
as 24-1485
Petitioner:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gary Keim v. Kevin Mazza, et al
as 24-5337
Plaintiff:
GARY KEIM
Defendant:
KEVIN MAZZA, BOBBI JO BUTTS and LESSYE CRAFTON
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Michigan Studs and Walls, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10907
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit & Vicinity, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Michigan Studs and Walls, LLC, Kevin Cox and Nathan McCardell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
