Cases 21 - 30 of 598
Campbell v. Vazquez et al
as 2:2024cv10394
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Campbell
Defendant:
Clinton Vazquez, Logan Township Police Department and United States Marshal Service
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Browder et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Antonio Browder and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Tiffany Williams, Logan Edwards, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Pamela Garcia and Logan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mintchie et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Robert Mintchie and Logan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Fox et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Cody Fox and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Ashby et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Tina Ashby, Kia Beard, Patricia Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldridge v. Norton Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Logan Aldridge
Defendant:
Norton Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
