Cases 21 - 30 of 64
JOHN DOE 1 et al v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , Jane Doe #1 , John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International Inc , MOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, MOES 11-25 and others
Movant:
Roderick M. Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stream, LLC v. The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02702
Plaintiff:
Stream, LLC
Defendant:
The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gladieux et al v. Moe's Transport Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01816
Plaintiff:
Michele L. Gladieux and Allan M. Gladieux
Defendant:
Moe's Transport Trucking, Inc. and Estate of Djordie Mihajlo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Khayo v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 1:2016cv00831
Defendant:
Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority and Eric Payne
Plaintiff:
Munir "Moe" Khayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moe v. City of Logan Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00654
Plaintiff:
Michael G Moe
Defendant:
City of Logan Ohio, Ethan Doerr and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moe v. City of Logan Ohio et al
as 2:2016oe00653
Plaintiff:
Michael G Moe
Defendant:
City of Logan Ohio, Ethan Doerr and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. USA et al
as 5:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Bell
Defendant:
USA and Moes, Does and Roes 1-1000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Manier et al
as 2:2015cv10363
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Lewis
Defendant:
Daniel Manier, Wayne Moe, Robert Miehlke, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
