Cases 21 - 30 of 3,532
Cantu et al v. Oceana, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Lydia Cantu, Gayla Carskadon, Daniel Ronneberg and others
Defendant:
Oceana, County of, Mary Lou Phillips and Sheila Gowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Elder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
Phillip Elder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Carpenter v. Shawn Phillips
as 24-5356
Petitioner:
DARRELL CARPENTER
Respondent:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
Wingate v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wingate
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Pryor v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3301
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of ODRC, In their individual and official capacity, LIEUTINENT ARIANNA BROCK, In their individual and official capacity, M. DARKANGELO, Mental Health Administrator, In their individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
