Cases 21 - 30 of 164
USA v. Robert Rucker
as 22-5604
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT RUCKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rucker v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02382
Plaintiff:
Reginald Rucker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Owens #829102 v. Briske et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Defendant:
Candi Mason, Unknown Dankfert, Addie Briske and others
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Jarmal Owens #829102
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant et al v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00018
Executor:
Jazmine Bryant
Plaintiff:
BJB
Defendant:
Bill Hensley, Tim Rucker, Zachary Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris Rucker v. Jim Purviance, et al
as 22-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS RUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM PURVIANCE, Executive Director of the Tennessee Board of Parole, RICHARD MONTGOMERY, Tennessee Chairman, ZANE DUNCAN, Tennessee Board Member, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Rucker v. Bristol West Ins. et al
as 2:2022cv02142
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Rucker
Defendant:
Bristol West Ins. and Tia McLann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rucker v. Bristol West Ins. et al
as 2:2022cv02143
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Rucker
Defendant:
Bristol West Ins. and Tia McLann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rucker v. Lorain County Health & Dentistry et al
as 1:2021cv02309
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rucker
Defendant:
Lorain County Health & Dentistry, Edward Cornett and Jennifer Casey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rucker v. Purviance et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Jim Purviance, Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
