Cases 31 - 40 of 17,161
Petersmark v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv11464
Petitioner:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Respondent:
J. Christiansen, Hedi E. Washington and John Christiansen
Robert Guritz v. James Corrigan
as 24-1484
Petitioner:
ROBERT EDWARD-OWEN GURITZ
Respondent:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv03078
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Defendant:
Julie Lynch, FREDERICK D. BENTON, CORY D. HELFFRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, 1019334 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, Burger King Canada Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Zackary Roberts
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
NicQuid, LLC, et al v. FDA, et al
as 24-3464
Petitioner:
NICQUID, LLC and WOOD CREEK VAPORY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, M.D. ROBERT CALIFF, Commissioner U.S. Food and Drug Administration and SECRETARY XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
England v. USA
as 6:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher England
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
