Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Borrelli Walsh Limited v. Pope Investments LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02880
Plaintiff:
Borrelli Walsh Limited
Defendant:
Pope Asset Management, LLC, Pope Investments LLC and William P. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Adams et al v. Adient US LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01197
Plaintiff:
Judy C Williams, Amber Tulley, Patricia Yarbro and others
Defendant:
Adient US LLC, Andre Gist, Manufacturers Industrial Group, L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
Natasha Renfroe
3Rd Party Defendant:
Hoover Universal, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Circuit Court Clerk Beverly Dunaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
USA v. Charles Pope
as 20-5868
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SAMUEL POPE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Pope
as 20-5866
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SAMUEL POPE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pope v. QCHC of Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00138
Plaintiff:
Alexis Z Pope
Defendant:
QCHC Healthcare Provider, QCHC of Tennessee, Inc. and Bradley County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pope v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2019cv00817
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00844
Defendant:
Vicki Freeman, f/n/u Lyttle, John Tidwell and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branham et al v. Bradley County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 1:2019cv00230
Defendant:
Naomi Baker, Johnny Edward Bates, M.D., Amy Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Estate Fawn Zanette Branham and Alexis Z Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patric Pope v. Shawn Phillips, et al
as 19-5300
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden, C.E.R.T. TEAM, M.C.C.X., JOHN DOES, Green Team Employees 1 - 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRIC POPE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
