Cases 31 - 40 of 179
Rankins v. Phillips et al
as 2:2021cv02758
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rankins
Defendant:
Wesley Scott Phillips, Boston Scientific, Regional One Hospital/Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
James Rankin v. Berrien County, MI
as 21-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BERRIEN COUNTY, MI
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rankins v. Nickels et al (TV2)
as 1:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Lamond Rankins
Defendant:
Jeremy Nickels and Crete Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirn et al v. Health System et al
as 2:2021cv12078
Plaintiff:
Katie Kirn, Allison Sleezer, Angela Carr and others
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Wright Lassiter III, Robert G Riney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castanon v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11942
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castanon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Robert Rankin and General Teamsters Local Union No. 406
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
gobah v. City of Hamtramck et al
as 2:2021cv11828
Plaintiff:
joshua gobah
Defendant:
City of Hamtramck, Brian Thome, Justin Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Bradley County Government et al (TV2)
as 1:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Alexis Z Pope
Defendant:
Bradley County Government, QCHC of Tennessee, Inc., Eric Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
