Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Acevedo v. Lorenzini
as 1:2010cv01280
Petitioner:
Gilbert Acevedo
Respondent:
J. Lorenzini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acevedo v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2010oe40027
Plaintiff:
Allison Acevedo
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. and Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acevedo v. USA
as 1:2010cv00046
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Gilbert Acevedo
as 09-4516
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GILBERT ACEVEDO
USA v. Gilbert Acevedo
as 09-4507
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GILBERT ACEVEDO
In re: Gilbert Acevedo
as 09-4195
Movant:
In re: GILBERT ACEVEDO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF OHIO
Acevedo v. Attorney General for the State of Ohio
as 1:2009cv01577
Petitioner:
Gilbert Acevedo
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Reyes v Ford Motor Company
as 2:2009cv12348
Plaintiff:
Jose A Rodriguez-Reyes, Jose A Rodriguez-Reyes, Juan Rodriguez-Acevedo and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Real Property
Velazquez v. CLM Pallet Recycling, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Domingo Acevedo Velazquez
Defendant:
CLM Pallet Recycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acevedo et al v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
as 3:2009cv00137
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Evan R. Acevedo, Evan R. Acevedo, Viktoria Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
