Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Courtney v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv12041
Plaintiff:
Brian Courtney
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Haynes, Duncan MacLaren and others
Martin v. Aramark Food Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv01112
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Aramark Food Corp., Barlett, Oxley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Pruitt v. Roederer Correctional Complex, et al
as 14-5838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR PRUITT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROEDERER CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, ET. AL., et. al.
White #198559 v. Barry et al
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brian White #198559
Defendant:
Herbert Barry, Joseph Neher, Robert Napel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Roederer Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Arthur Pruitt
Defendant:
Roederer Correctional Complex, Aramark Food Service, Mike Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sleighter v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2013cv01071
Plaintiff:
Bradley Keith Sleighter
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Kent County Correctional Facility, Kent County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. Shelby Co. Justice Center et al
as 2:2011cv02180
Plaintiff:
Everett L. Russ
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Justice Center, Aramark Food Service, C. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Bredsen et al
as 2:2010cv02950
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Simpson
Defendant:
Phil Bredsen, William Oldham, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2010cv02287
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hoskins
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Shelby County Justice Center, Mark Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 3:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hoskins
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Shelby County Justice Center, Mark Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
