Cases 31 - 40 of 240
USA v. Alexis Rodgers
as 22-1951
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXIS REDD RODGERS
Lynema v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Alexis Marie Lynema
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Carl Bennett v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, staff involved in surgery and others
Alexis RamirezIn re: Alexis Ramirez
as 22-3814
Petitioner:
In re: ALEXIS RAMIREZ
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP, Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Keenan v. Burntwood Tavern Holdings LLC d/b/a Burntwood Tavern et al
as 1:2022cv01733
Plaintiff:
Alexis Keenan
Defendant:
Burntwood Tavern Holdings LLC d/b/a Burntwood Tavern, Burntwood Tavern Holdings, LLC doing business as Burntwood Tavern, Minute Men Select Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Duvall et al v. Dungarvin Ohio, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03372
Plaintiff:
Lora Duvall and Alexis Ross
Defendant:
Dungarvin Ohio, LLC and Dungarvin, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McPhaul et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11987
Plaintiff:
Rudy McPhaul and David Richbow
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Nathan Miller, Alexis Jackson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
