Cases 31 - 40 of 367
Gifford v. Hamilton County Government
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Bradford Anthony Gifford
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
Michael Bradford v. Team Pizza, Inc., et al
as 22-3561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BRADFORD, On behalf of himself and those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
TEAM PIZZA, INC. and CHRIS SHORT
Metcalf #09198-040 v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00577
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Bradford Metcalf #09198-040
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradford v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv11270
Plaintiff:
Shade Bradford
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Darion BradfordIn re: Darion Bradford
as 22-1496
Petitioner:
In re: DARION D. BRADFORD
Respondent:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Bradford v. Braman
as 2:2022cv11196
Petitioner:
Darion D. Bradford
Respondent:
E. Braman and Melinda Braman
Bradford MetcalfIn re: Bradford Metcalf
as 22-1334
Petitioner:
In re: BRADFORD METCALF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
