Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Daniel #537193 v. Sherry et al
as 2:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Jeri-Ann Sherry, Unknown Mackie, Unknown Boyton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2009cv00001
Petitioner:
Thaddeus D Daniel
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, State of Tennessee and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. Bell et al
as 1:2008cv01227
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Thomas K. Bell, Gary Capello, Blaine C. Lafler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. McQuiggin et al
as 2:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Greg McQuiggin, Linda Tribley, W. Jondreau and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. Bell et al
as 1:2008cv00829
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Thomas K. Bell, Tony Trierweiler, Robert Mote and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. McKee et al
as 1:2008cv00757
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Kenneth McKee, Unknown Orbin, Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. Curtin et al
as 1:2008cv00685
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Cindi S. Curtin, Unknown Brewer, Scott Peiton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Office of Administrative Hearings, Jeri-Ann Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv00666
Plaintiff:
Linda D Daniels
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniel v. Lindamood
as 1:2007cv00045
Petitioner:
Thaddeus D. Daniel
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
