Cases 31 - 40 of 511
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Akers
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Daniel Akers and Damon Hininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fayne v. Tipton Co. et al
as 2:2023cv02719
Plaintiff:
Larry Jr. Fayne and Larry D. Fayne, Jr.
Defendant:
Tipton Co., Shannon Beasley, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atha v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Atha
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hinniegar and Patrick Swindell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and Damon Steven Lewis
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knox v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Angela Boatwright Knox
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC doing business as Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Vince Vantell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eduardo Jacobs v. Raymon Alam, et al
as 23-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDUARDO JACOBS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMON ALAM, DAMON KIMBROUGH and DAVE WEINMAN
Pennoyer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03313
Plaintiff:
Damon Pennoyer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
