Cases 31 - 40 of 639
Borchick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Duane Borchick
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill #345396 v. Heidenreich et al
as 1:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Edward Duane Hill #345396
Defendant:
Stacie Heidenreich, Suzanne Groff, Michael Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Duane Berry
as 23-1720
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Boyde v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
Duane Boyde
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Austin Endsley and Daniel Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. World Wrestling Entertainment et al
as 4:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Wilson
Defendant:
Word Wrestling Entertainment, All Elite Wrestling and World Wrestling Entertainment
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gregley v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv01473
Petitioner:
Duane Gregley
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Justin Howard v. Bryan Morrison
as 23-1681
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN DUANE HOWARD
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
