Cases 31 - 40 of 532
Tinsley #360973 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Choya Tinsley #360973
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Chris King, B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cary et al v. Washington
as 2:2023cv13197
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary and Stearns
Defendant:
Heidi Washington
Crump v. Nagy et al
as 2:2023cv13138
Defendant:
Eric Stockall, Noah Nagy, Tiffani Kisor and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Len Crump
Atkins #333064 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Frederick Nigel Atkins #333064
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Catherine Bauman, Jeff Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12720
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A. Bell
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Matt McCauley, Rander Rewers and others
Taggert #528877 v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Osaze Taggert #528877
Defendant:
Erik S. Johnson, Sarah Schroeder, Richard D. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bozzo v. Nanasy et al
as 1:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Charles Bozzo
Defendant:
Jennifer Nanasy and Heidi Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Earvin Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARVIN R. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of the M.D.O.C. individually and in her official capacities, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, hereinafter refers to agents of Heidi Washington, JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden, individually and in his official capacities and others
Talamantez #406724 v. Washington
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Paul Talamantez #406724
Defendant:
Heidi Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12903
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Willis Chapman, Kristopher Steece and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
