Cases 31 - 40 of 3,045
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cormia v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Dolwin D. Cormia
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Michael R. Hodges, Jr., Rhett Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D'Andre Brown v. FBOP, et al
as 24-5403
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE ROLAND BROWN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE #1, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary, JOHN DOE #2, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary and others
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zocher v. Flexshopper, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv11025
Plaintiff:
Caroline G. Zocher
Defendant:
Flexshopper, LLC Doing business as Liberty Tax & Loans and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
