Cases 31 - 40 of 544
Heard v. Knight
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A Heard
Defendant:
Captain Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Next Level Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dwan Brooks, Mark Anthony Carter, Dioveon Allen and others
Defendant:
Next Level Relief, LLC, Brandon Cain and Justin Bowie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Johnson v. Silverdale Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Henry C Johnson
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center, Captain Knight, Detective Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Knight
as 3:2023mc00057
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A Heard
Defendant:
Captain Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadnax v. Saidbury et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Everett J Broadnax
Defendant:
William Saidbury, Captain Knight, Detective Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Knight et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight and Correction Officer Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knights v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Michael Lawrence Knights
Respondent:
Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Lee v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv12159
Plaintiff:
Knight Elbert Lee
Defendant:
Martha D Anderson, Dana M Nessel, Lisa Brown and others
Claiborne v. Leeds
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Mischa Knight Claiborne
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Simmons v. Hamilton Cnty, TN, et al
as 23-5509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CREED SIMMONS, as Next of Kin of Jeffrey Jerome Simmons, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMILTON COUNTY, TN, OFFICER PATRICK RAMSEY, OFFICER JASON KIBBLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
