Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Lansing, City of v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lansing, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trevino et al v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2019cv00349
Defendant:
City of Lansing, Walter Allen, Christopher Blackburn and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dario Trevino and Hydroworld, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Graham v. Lansing, City of
as 1:2018cv01449
Plaintiff:
Gregory Arthur Graham
Defendant:
Lansing, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savoie et al v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv01180
Defendant:
matthew swab, Jeff Murphy, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Paige Louise Hooper and Tiffany Louise Savoie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spalding v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2018cv00819
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Doug R. Sharp, Melissa Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Kindi Spalding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Lansing, City of
as 1:2018cv00568
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Lansing, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership
Defendant:
East Lansing, City of and Scott Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership
Defendant:
East Lansing, City of and Scott Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canja v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey H. Canja
Defendant:
East Lansing, City of and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
