Cases 31 - 40 of 8,047
Jackson v. City of Canton et al.
as 5:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Destinee N. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Canton, Lieutenant Lester Marino, Sergeant Bryan McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarvin et al v. Cobble et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Tarvin and Annie Barnes
Defendant:
Brett Cobble and f/n/u Higdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1320
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, DAWN N. ISON, DIANE NICOLE PRINC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Arbogast v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01729
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Arbogast
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ferguson v. BlendedTraditions Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
William Ferguson
Defendant:
BlendedTraditions Inc. and Tasha N. Harris
Cohen v. Mangrove Motorsports LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10927
Plaintiff:
Matan Cohen
Defendant:
Mangrove Motorsports LLC and Charles N Bugbee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Merrick v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65177
Plaintiff:
Ryan N. Merrick
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
