Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Trombley v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00733
Defendant:
H. James Williams, William Norris Jennings, Michael Dinkins and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Trombley
USA v. Tori Smith
as 19-3759
Defendant / Appellant:
TORI T. SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 19-509
Not Classified By Court:
NORFOLK COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al.
Respondent:
NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM VARIABLE ANNUITY PROGRAM, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT PENSION FUND, NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Petitioner:
W. LARRY CASH, WAYNE T. SMITH and In re: COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Smith v. Storm
as 3:2019cv01396
Defendant:
Vicky A Storm
Plaintiff:
Dean T Smith and Dean Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Sturghill v. Shelby County Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv02364
Defendant:
Officer Vance, SGT Boyd, T. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Sturghill, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00461
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc., Larry Cash, Wayne T. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Padilla
In re: Quorum Health Corporation, et al
as 19-505
Petitioner:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., W. LARRY CASH, THOMAS D. MILLER and others
Respondent:
APARNA RAO and ZWICK PARTNERS, LP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Smith v. Mohr et al
as 2:2018cv00679
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Ms. Higginbotham and Timothy Shoop
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Smith
as 2:2018mc50700
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Claude T. Smith
Nikita Smith, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 17-1907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKITA T. SMITH and KEVIN D. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, BASHAWN GAINES, Police Officer, WILLIAM MORRISON, Police Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
