Cases 31 - 40 of 8,667
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00280
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv01005
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee, Travis Lampley, Scott Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dutton v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01006
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee, Syler Warley and Zachary Williams
Plaintiff:
David Dutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Vandenburg v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Brandon R. Vandenburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peck v. Simmons et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Treasa Peck
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, Allstate Insurance Company and Jeffrey Wade Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Goodwin v. City of Bristol, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Defendant:
Eric Keller, Scott Shaffer, John Kistner and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00334
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
Zachary Michael Johnson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
