Cases 41 - 50 of 1,733
Evans #770290 v. Ordiway et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Evans #770290
Defendant:
P. Ordiway and Unknown Tamlyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alfano et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Alfano and Evan Alfano
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Progressive Marathon Insurance Company v. Strahl
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Progressive Marathon Insurance Company
Defendant:
Evan Strahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Evans v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Freddie Evans
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Citizens Insurance Company of the Midwest v. Yancey et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Citizens Insurance Company of the Midwest
Defendant:
Jamie Yancey and Sharde Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10370
Petitioner:
Evan Alexander Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
