Cases 41 - 50 of 1,832
Jones #617568 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Justin Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Alexander, Jr.In re: John Alexander, Jr.
as 24-1093
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ALLEN ALEXANDER, JR.
Respondent:
JEFF HOWARD, Warden
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Hodge v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Shaun Alexander Hodge
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wiggins and Lawrence Alexander Wiggins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamblin v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamblin
Defendant:
Anthony Alexander, Mr. Doctor Morton, Erica N. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jonny Reyes-Martinez v. Jason Woosley
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
JONNY ALEXANDER REYES MARTINEZ and JONNY ALEXANDER REYES-MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JASON WOOSLEY
Alexander #182285 v. Rewerts
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
John Allen Alexander #182285
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
