Cases 41 - 50 of 70
McCowan #892497 v. Trierweiler
as 1:2016cv01310
Petitioner:
Conner Channing McCowan #892497
Respondent:
Tony Trierweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hu et al v. Chan et al
as 1:2015cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jiaxi Hu , Mengfang Li , Xiaoyan Wu and others
Defendant:
Terry Chan, Gary Chan, Martin Angiulli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kenneth Johnson v. Keith Papendick, et al
as 15-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH PAPENDICK, MD, (RMO), TERENCE WHITEMAN, Sup. Physician, LYNN LARSON and others
Chan et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company dba Harleysville
as 2:2015cv02483
Plaintiff:
Thoern Chan and Momhourn Chan
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Papendick et al
as 2:2014cv14630
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Keith Papendick , Jeffrey Stieve, Kevin M. Chan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00183
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Kelly v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21277
Plaintiff:
Katherine Kelly
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy International Limited , Channing Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kilgore v. Kim
as 1:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Kilgore, III
Defendant:
Hyung Chan Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
USA v. Chan Shin
as 12-4415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHAN HO SHIN
United States of America v. $7,823.00 United States Currency et al
as 3:2011cv00759
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,823.00 United States Currency, $25,544.00 United States Currency, $10,640.00 United States Currency in Safe Deposit Box 704, First National Bank of Pulaski and others
Claimant:
Frank Dwayne Randolph
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
