Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Brooks #153447 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Preston Purnell #526991, Kentreze White #799568, Dreshawn Dawon Harris #415940 and others
Defendant:
Unknown Gierke, Heidi E. Washington, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Desmond Camp
as 20-2188
Defendant / Appellant:
DESMOND CAMP
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Skyworks, Ltd., et al v Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 5:2020cv02407
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Nina B. Witkofsky and others
Plaintiff:
Cedarwood Village Apartments I & II Owner B, LLC, Monarch Investment and Management Group, Toledo Properties Owner B, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Julia Raifman, Sabriya A Linton, Community Legal Aid Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Desmond Logan
as 20-5988
Defendant / Appellant:
DESMOND LADON LOGAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Desmond Ricks, et al v. David Pauch, et al
as 20-1778
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DESIRE'A RICKS, AKILAH COBB and DESMOND RICKS
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD STAWIASZ, DAVID PAUCH and ROBERT B. WILSON
In re: Desmond Rodgers
as 20-1519
Petitioner:
In re: DESMOND REGINALD RODGERS, aka Butter, aka Butta
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Price v. Tenn. Board of Paroles
as 2:2020cv02225
Respondent:
Tenn. Board of Paroles and Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Desmond Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Jeffrey Carter
as 20-5289
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY DESMOND CARTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Desmond Warren v. Ronald Erdos
as 19-4187
Petitioner / Appellant:
DESMOND ERIC WARREN
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden
Vernon Proctor v. Karen Krzanowski, et al
as 19-2347
Defendant / Appellee:
DESMOND MITCHELL and KAREN KRZANOWSKI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON EUGENE PROCTOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
