Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Schmuker v. Deutchman et al
as 2:2022cv10889
Plaintiff:
Amber Schmuker
Defendant:
Cara Deutchman, Sun Yoon Yang, Iesha Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Farley et al v. Potter et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Chad Farley and Jessica Farley
Defendant:
Wayne Potter, Teddy Bales, Lonnie Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Isabel Teresa Fernande Jenkins
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Chattanooga Police Department, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burger v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jillian Burger
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Mark Von Roden, Stacy Weed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cairl v. Polmax, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Virginia Cairl and Ohio Department of Medicaid
Defendant:
Polmax, LLC doing business as Experior Transport, Keystone Leasing, LLC, Leszek Wieleba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022oe00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021oe04868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
