Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Jade Clothing LLC v. Jade's Closet LLC
as 1:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Jade Clothing LLC
Defendant:
Jade's Closet LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Shafer v. David Reese et al
as 3:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Sonda Shafer
Defendant:
David Reese, Jade Michael Cooper, Jason Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntyre v. Shank Concrete, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
Patrick McIntyre
Defendant:
Shank Concrete, LLC, Jade Shank and April Shank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
DT Fashion LLC v. Cline et al
as 2:2015cv03020
Plaintiff:
DT Fashion LLC
Defendant:
Santana Jade Cline and The Dark Monkey LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
USA v. Desera Allen
as 15-5785
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DESERA JADE ALLEN
Smith et al v. Hoffner et al
as 2:2015cv10349
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith, Sherri Slaght, George Preston and others
Defendant:
Bonita Hoffner, Borst, Scheidler and others
Ellora's Cave Publishing, Inc. et al v. Dear Author Media Network, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv02331
Plaintiff:
Ellora's Cave Publishing, Inc. and Jasmine-Jade Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Dear Author Media Network, LLC and Jennifer Gerrish-Lampe
Intervenor:
Ann Josephson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips and Jordan, Inc. et al v. Laughter et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Phillips and Jordan, Inc. and Phillips and Jordan, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Angela Laughter, Melissa Jordan, Jade Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Jade Enterprises et al
as 5:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jade Enterprises and Harold Jolly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jade A. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
