Cases 41 - 50 of 65
United States of America et al v. Carter
as 2:2013mc51574
Defendant:
Marcus Carter
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Keisha Stevens
Bates v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00778
Plaintiff:
Keisha Bates
Defendant:
Kevin O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolf, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jackson v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00768
Plaintiff:
Keisha S Jackson
Defendant:
Kevin J O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolfe, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2013cv00733
Plaintiff:
Keisha King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Project Reflect, Inc. Smithson Craighead Middle School et al v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education et al
as 3:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
Project Reflect, Inc. Smithson Craighead Middle School , Zina Grant Taylor and Keisha Lashonda Johnson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education , Jesse Register and Alan Coverstone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keisha Allen v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 2:2013cv02187
Plaintiff:
Keisha Allen
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Watt v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv14430
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Keisha Watt
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv13809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
USA v. Keisha Lafleur
as 12-5793
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEISHA R. LAFLEUR
Taylor v. Pine Meadows Health Care LLC
as 5:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Keisha Taylor
Defendant:
Pine Meadows Health Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
