Cases 41 - 50 of 544
Anderson Eye Care of West Tennessee v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv01092
Not Classified By Court:
Regina VanCleave
Plaintiff:
Anderson Eye Care of West Tennessee
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Michael Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Jonathan Hicks v. Kerry Knight
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN HICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
KERRY KNIGHT
Knight v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Delbert L. Knight
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks et al v. Knight Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01073
Not Classified By Court:
Gail Mooney
Plaintiff:
Natavious Banks and Nicole Banks
Defendant:
Knight Transportation, Inc. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knight v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Denada Knight
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thacker v. Phelps et al
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dianne Thacker
Defendant:
Jody Phelps, Shauna, Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Knight
as 5:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Timothy Cole McNeal
Respondent:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Basil Lewis, Jr. v. Phil Knight, et al
as 23-5147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BASIL WARREN LEWIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PHIL KNIGHT, Owner, Nike, Inc., MICHAEL JORDAN BRAND and TINKER HATFIELD, Designer
Tripplet v. Knight et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Tripplet
Defendant:
David Knight and Sgt. David Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
