Cases 41 - 50 of 1,024
Bolden v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12497
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden
Defendant:
John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Milhouse et al
as 2:2023cv12434
Plaintiff:
Ardell Hairston
Defendant:
Milhouse, Piva, Martinez and others
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01877
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Owens v. Williams
as 5:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
A Martinez Owens
Defendant:
Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonel Miranda v. Owensboro Police Department, et al
as 23-5801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONEL MARTINEZ MIRANDA, aka Leonel Miranda Martinez
Defendant / Appellee:
OWENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, MPD, OFFICER TIM CLOTHIER, in their individual and official capacities and others
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corporaal v. Janes et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Levi Daniel Corporaal
Defendant:
Nora Janes, Stephen Harmon, Deputy Stucey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Leonel MartinezIn re: Leonel Martinez
as 23-5751
Petitioner:
In re: LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
Leonel Martinez v. Lee County Adjustment Center, et al
as 23-5702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ, aka Leonel Martinez Miranda
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY ADJUSTMENT CENTER and MITCHELL BRANDENBURG, ADA Coordinator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
