Cases 41 - 50 of 1,779
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Travis v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Travis
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fambro v. J & P Sommer Burritos, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Diane Fambro
Defendant:
J & P Sommer Burritos, LLC, Jason Sommer and Pamela Sommer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5195
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STEVEN JOHN MULROY, in his individual and official capacity as the District Attorney General and AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seneca Re-Ad Indust, Inc. v. Sec of the DOL, et al
as 24-3191
Plaintiff:
SENECA RE-AD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
ACTING SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Julie A. Su and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Intervenor:
RALPH MAGERS, PAMELA STEWARD and MARK FELTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Green et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 2:2024cv01027
Interested Party:
Pamela Delpapa
Plaintiff:
Samara Green, Brett Jacob and Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
