Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
O'Reilly Media, Inc. v. Strata Big Data LLC
as 5:2014cv10024
Defendant:
Strata Big Data LLC
Plaintiff:
O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Raimondo v. Armada, Village of et al
as 2:2013cv14773
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raimondo
Defendant:
Armada, Village of, Meadowbrook Claims Services, Garan, Lucow, Miller P.C. Thomas F Myers and others
Adkins, et al. v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund, Inc., et al.
as 2:2013cv02843
Plaintiff:
Gerald Adkins , John Barringer, Earl Bentz and others
Defendant:
Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund, Inc, RMK High Income Fund, Inc, RMK Strategic Income Fund, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Sevier v. Rich et al
as 3:2013cv01098
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
John Rich, Bill O'Reilly, T.V. Guide Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Reilly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harpster v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv01932
Plaintiff:
Larry Harpster
Defendant:
State of Ohio, County of Ashland and Paul O. Reilly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02684
Plaintiff:
Belinda Simpson
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. , Vista-Pro Automotive, LLC and Ozark Automotive Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Reilly v. USA
as 2:2013cv13075
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Timothy Dennis O'Reilly
Reilly v. Meffe et al
as 2:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Reilly
Defendant:
Domenick Meffe and Richard J. Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
