Cases 41 - 50 of 11,943
Norman Pryor v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3301
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of ODRC, In their individual and official capacity, LIEUTINENT ARIANNA BROCK, In their individual and official capacity, M. DARKANGELO, Mental Health Administrator, In their individual and official capacity and others
Patrick ShankIn re: Patrick Shank
as 24-3509
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK J. SHANK
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Patrick Shank
as 24-3501
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK J. SHANK
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
Smith #443755 v. Hunt
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Fredricks Smith #443755
Defendant:
Unknown Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Smith v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Philip Terry Smith
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
