Cases 51 - 60 of 308
Sunder v. Tietgens Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clyde Sunder
Defendant:
Tietgens Enterprises, Inc. and Mark Tietgens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams v. Galyon et al
as 2:2020cv00205
Plaintiff:
Shannon T Adams
Defendant:
Al Smutzer, Jr, Derick Newport, Jerry Galyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walburn et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv04621
Plaintiff:
Chaz Lawson, Vicki P. Slone, James A Walburn and others
Defendant:
Clyde Dulin, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Harris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03601
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03087
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Borawski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Clyde Borawski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Paul Soares v. Estate Of Clyde Boyd, et al
as 20-5452
Defendant / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES & ENERGY, a Kentucky Limited Liability Company, JOHN DOES, Sued as "Does 1-50, Inclusive", ROBERT SKEANS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL F. SOARES
Murriel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv01662
Plaintiff:
Clyde S Murriel
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coward et al v. Richard Snyder et al
as 5:2020cv10307
Plaintiff:
E. B., Monica Embeck, Romell Barkus and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Prysby, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clyde Pontefract v. USA, et al
as 20-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NICK FERGUNSON, Food Administrator
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
