Cases 51 - 60 of 276
Huang v. Presbyterian Church (USA) et al
as 3:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeff Huang
Defendant:
Presbyterian Church (USA), University of Pikeville, Linda Dunatov and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cage v. Nwozo et al
as 3:2017cv01214
Plaintiff:
Quinton A. Cage
Defendant:
Madu Nwozo, David Sehorn, Liz Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Anderson v. Aramark Facility Service LLC, et al
as 17-1893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICE LLC, DIANA CURTIS, BOBBY BANKS and others
James Beard, Jr. v. Religious Denom Churches, et al
as 17-5787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. BEARD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONAL CHURCHES and ORGANIZATIONS USING THE NAME OR REFERENCE TO THE NAME JESUS CHRIST
James Beard, Jr. v. Memphis Cr & Judicial System, et al
as 17-5788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. BEARD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS, TN CRIMINAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM, LOAMMA SMITH, HELEN JOHNSON and others
Beard v. Religious Denominational Churches et al
as 2:2017cv02182
Plaintiff:
James H. Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
Religious Denominational Churches and Organizations Using the Name or Reference to the Name Jesus Christ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Memphis, Tn. Criminal and Judicial System et al
as 2:2017cv02184
Plaintiff:
James H. Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
Memphis, Tn. Criminal and Judicial System, LoAmma Smith, Helen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boulger v. Woods
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Portia A. Boulger
Defendant:
James H. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Bennett et al
as 5:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Estate of Duane H. Bennett, Sr., Benjamin R. Bennett, Black Star Land & Mining, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
