Cases 51 - 60 of 696
Livingston v. Lawson et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Sandra Livingston
Defendant:
Steve Lawson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Laws v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Steven J Laws
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Armando Fontes, Joshua R Hartsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lawson v. Wilson
as 6:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Leslie Lawson
Respondent:
Jason Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hughes v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Respondent:
Russell Washburn and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawson v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Lawson
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Tennessee CVS Pharmacy, LLC and DiMucci Brainerd Property LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
Lamarion Hill
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections and L. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Ballad Health
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Corey Hall, Anna M Ayers, Chloe Burleson and others
Counter Claimant:
Ballad Health
Defendant:
Janice L Nelson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lawson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. LAWSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DELANO LAWSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
