Cases 51 - 60 of 5,965
Carol Roth v. Adam Rogers
as 24-5533
Petitioner:
CAROL ROTH
Respondent:
ADAM P. ROGERS, Director of Industry Operations, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives
April Clark v. Littler Mendelson PC, et al
as 24-3531
Defendant:
BRIAN D. SPITZ, KAREN P. GASTER, CVS HEALTH PHARMACY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL CLARK
White v. McNevin
as 4:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Jermeal G. White
Defendant:
Lieutenant P. McNevin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Roetting et al.
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Shareena Brooks
Defendant:
Micahel P Roetting, Michael P. Roetting and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Shane J Hardymon and Shane Hardymon
Defendant:
Scott Kent, Michael P. Davis, Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. $774,830.00 in U.S. Currency
as 24-3505
Defendant:
$774,830.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
ALEXANDRE P. HAUSSMANN
Staffney v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11678
Defendant:
Wilbur Gross, Kristine Botsford Mullendore, Phillip D. Comorski and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-3405
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
