Cases 61 - 70 of 13,774
Flickinger v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02438
Plaintiff:
Justin Flickinger
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association, LJN Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Quantum Group, LLC v. Halcyon HempWorks, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00867
Defendant:
Kathryn Purmal, Halcyon HempWorks, LLC, James Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Quantum Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hardy v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2024cv11270
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Defendant:
Whitaker, Wallenman, Lipset and others
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Gillespie v. Chambers-Smith, et al.
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Spencer v. Stoyk et al
as 2:2024cv11255
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Spencer
Defendant:
Stoyk, Duperron and John Doe
Woods v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv02304
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Steve Woods
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as The Home Depot and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
