Cases 61 - 70 of 133
Lechleiter v. SEI/Aaron's, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00694
Plaintiff:
Charles Lechleiter, III
Defendant:
SEI/Aaron's, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Hannah Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Scherer, Sr. v. James Wiles, et al
as 15-3832
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
RONALD E. SCHERER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JAMES M. WILES, Esq. and WILES, BOYLE, BURKHOLDER, & BRINGARDNER CO., LPA
Ronald Scherer, Sr. v. James Wiles, et al
as 15-3809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD E. SCHERER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. WILES, Esq. and WILES, BOYLE, BURKHOLDER, & BRINGARDNER CO., LPA
Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al v. Slatery et al
as 3:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Adams & Boyle, P.C. , Wesley F. Adams, Jr. and Memphis Center for Reproductive Health
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III , Michael D. Zanolli, M.D. and John Dreyzehner, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20138
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Boyle
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konica Minolta Business Solutions, U.S.A., Inc. v. Applied Imaging Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11254
Plaintiff:
Konica Minolta Business Solutions, U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Applied Imaging Systems, Inc. , Matt Aron , Rob Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyle v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2015cv10257
Plaintiff:
Maureen Boyle
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Henderson v. State of Ohio, et al.
as 1:2014cv02826
Plaintiff:
Paul S. Henderson
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Anthony Quirino, Bob Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Boyle , Jr. v. Mary Burge
as 14-2256
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW JAY BOYLE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY BURGESS
Pollock v. Roberts et al
as 3:2014cv01806
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Pollock
Defendant:
Ray Roberts and Jerry Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
