Cases 61 - 70 of 1,386
Coleman v. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Trina Coleman
Defendant:
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., Hertz Corporation, Hertz Vehicles, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Valdez-Sandoval v. Journey Community Schools
as 2:2023cv02534
Plaintiff:
Alicia Valdez-Sandoval
Defendant:
Journey Community Schools doing business as Coleman School
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Joel Carter v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL MARCEL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, JEFFREY STIEVE, Chief Medical Officer, RICKEY J. COLEMAN, Assistant Chief Medical Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Charles Cater v. Brian Sanders, et al
as 23-5719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES O. CATER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SANDERS, RUSSELL MATTHEW COLEMAN, JASON CLAPTON and others
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Coleman v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jonee Coleman
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDuff v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv11739
Plaintiff:
Richard McDuff
Defendant:
Kristen Jones, Megan Oaks and Coleman
Newell v. Branch et al
as 2:2023cv11712
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Newell
Defendant:
Branch, Sotherland, Lori A. Coleman and others
Brooks v. Next Level Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dwan Brooks, Mark Anthony Carter, Dioveon Allen and others
Defendant:
Next Level Relief, LLC, Brandon Cain and Justin Bowie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
