Cases 61 - 70 of 5,528
Baker et al v. Ambasador Nursing and Rehab et al
as 4:2024cv10791
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker and Richard Perry
Defendant:
Ambasador Nursing and Rehab, Frank LNU, April LNU and others
Brown et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2024cv10779
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Brown, Tianna Hubbard, Rozia Robertson and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Officer Terri Graham, Wayne, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Jefferson County Department of Job & Family Services et al
as 2:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
David Powell
Defendant:
Jefferson County Department of Job & Family Services, ODJFS, Ohio Medicaid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Chae Harris, C.O. McKinley, C.O. J. Umstead and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kuerbitz v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2024cv10774
Plaintiff:
Arnold Kuerbitz
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Karen McDonald and John and Jane Does
Clark v. Carlstar Group, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clark
Defendant:
Carlstar Group, LLC, Jacob Thomas, Titan International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
