Cases 61 - 70 of 139
USA v. Michael Metcalf
as 15-6355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. METCALF
Rachel Rentz et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rentz , Georgia Metcalfe , Vivian Ponce and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Geneva France, et al v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 15-3593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENEVA FRANCE and LOWESTCO BALLARD
Plaintiff:
CHARMIN BALLARD, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE LUCAS, CHARLES METCALF, MATT MAYER and others
Metcalf et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00118
Plaintiff:
Denita Metcalf and D A
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Shaver v. Brimfield Township, et al
as 15-3089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SHAVER, Administrator of the Estate of Deceased Mark Shaver
Defendant:
BRIMFIELD TOWNSHIP
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PORTAGE COUNTY, DAVID W. DOAK, Individually and in his official capacity as Portage County Sheriff and others
Metcalf v. Kroger Company, The
as 2:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Metcalf
Defendant:
Kroger Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metcalf v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Metcalf
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Sidney Metcalf
as 14-5641
Movant:
In re: SIDNEY METCALF
Respondent:
GERALD MCALLISTER, Warden, Warden
Joshawa Webb, et al v. USA, et al
as 14-3443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHAWA WEBB, obo Kalib Webb
Plaintiff:
LAKISHA WEBB and JUANITA BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE LUCAS, Drug Enforcement Administration Agent, ROBERT CROSS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MANSFIELD and UNKNOWN MANSFIELD POLICE OFFICERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
